Mo. Ethics Comm'n v. Reed

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mo. Ethics Comm'n v. Reed

566 S.W.3d 633

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2018·No. WD 81125·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

While Appellant Steven Reed was running as a candidate for Mayor of Springfield in 2015, he filed a quarterly campaign finance report twenty-three days late. Respondent Missouri Ethics Commission assessed Reed a fee of $230.00 ($10.00 for each day the report was delinquent) pursuant *634to § 105.963.1, RSMo. The Commission then filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Cole County seeking collection of the late-filing fee. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the Commission. Reed appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

While Appellant Steven Reed was running as a candidate for Mayor of Springfield in 2015, he filed a quarterly campaign finance report twenty-three days late. Respondent Missouri Ethics Commission assessed Reed a fee of $230.00 ($10.00 for each day the report was delinquent) pursuant *634to § 105.963.1, RSMo. The Commission then filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Cole County seeking collection of the late-filing fee. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the Commission. Reed appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Mo. Ethics Comm'n v. Reed, 566 S.W.3d 633 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

566 S.W.3d 633 (Mo. Ethics Comm'n v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.