M.O. Dion and Sons, Inc. v. VP Racing Fuels, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided March 4, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-05154·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 M.O. DION & SONS, INC., et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-05154-MWF-KESx 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 VP RACING FUELS, INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 As the parties have represented that discovery in this action is likely to 19 involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which 20 special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 21 prosecuting this litigation may be warranted, this Court enters the following 22 Protective Order. This Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 23 or responses to discovery. The protection it affords from public disclosure and use 24 extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 25 treatment under the applicable legal principles. Further, as set forth in Section 12.3, 26 below, this Protective Order does not entitle the parties to file confidential 27 information under seal. Rather, when the parties seek permission from the court to 1 file material under seal, the parties must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and 2 with any pertinent orders of the assigned District Judge and Magistrate Judge. 4 In light of the nature of the claims and allegations in this case—e.g., a dispute 5 between competitors in connection with racing fuel and the anticipated need for the 6 disclosure of information regarding research and development, formulation, 7 manufacturing, specifications, etc. of racing fuels—and the parties’ representations 8 that discovery in this case will involve the production of confidential records, and in 9 order to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of 10 disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect 11 information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are 12 permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in connection with this action, 13 to address their handling of such material at the end of the litigation, and to serve the 14 ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. 15 The parties shall not designate any information/documents as confidential without a 16 good faith belief that such information/documents have been maintained in a 17 confidential, non-public manner, and that there is good cause or a compelling reason 18 why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 19 2. DEFINITIONS 20 2.1 Action: The instant action: M.O. Dion & Sons, Inc., et al. v. VP 21 Racing Fuels, Inc., et al., C.D. Cal. Case No. 2:19-cv-05154-MWF-SSx. 22 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 23 designation of information or items under this Order. 24 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 25 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 26 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 27 the Good Cause Statement. 1 Information or Items: extremely sensitive “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or 2 Items, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a 3 substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 4 2.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 5 their support staff). 6 2.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 7 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 8 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL -- ATTORNEYS’ EYES 9 ONLY.” 10 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 11 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 12 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 13 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 14 2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 15 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 16 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 17 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 18 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 19 counsel. 20 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 21 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 22 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 23 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 24 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 25 which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 26 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 27 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 1 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 2 Discovery Material in this Action. 3 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 4 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 5 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 6 and their employees and subcontractors. 7 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 8 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL -- 9 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 10 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 11 Material from a Producing Party. 12 3. SCOPE 13 The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as 14 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 15 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; 16 and (3) any deposition testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their 17 Counsel that might reveal Protected Material, other than during a court hearing or at 18 trial. 19 However, the protections conferred by this Order do not cover the following 20 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of 21 disclosure to a Receiving Party or which becomes part of the public domain after its 22 disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of 23 this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; 24 and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or 25 obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the 26 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 27 Party. 1 Any use of Protected Material during a court hearing or at trial shall be 2 governed by the orders of the presiding judge. This Order does not govern the use 3 of Protected Material during a court hearing or at trial. 4 4. DURATION 5 Once a case proceeds to trial, any Party may use at trial any of the 6 information that was designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 7 CONFIDENTIAL -- ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or maintained as such pursuant 8 to this protective order, and such information will become public and will be 9 presumptively available to all members of the public, unless compelling reasons 10 supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial 11 judge by the Designating Party in advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City and 12 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.O. Dion and Sons, Inc. v. VP Racing Fuels, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2020).

M.O. Dion and Sons, Inc. v. VP Racing Fuels, Inc. (M.O. Dion and Sons, Inc. v. VP Racing Fuels, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)