M'Neills cafe

New York Supreme Court

M'Neills cafe

1 Cai. Cas. 72

DecidedMay 15, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 72 (M'Neills cafe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Neills cafe, 1 Cai. Cas. 72 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

THE prifoner had, together with two other perfons, been 1 > & r * conviffed of a confpiracy at the laft oyer and terminer for the Clty an<* county of New-York, but had not furrendcred to his bail in time to receive fentence : he afterwards came in, and was novv brought up, on his own petition, to. have judgment pronounced; the public proiecutor appeared, but the record of [73]*73the conviction not being made up and brought into court, the bench faid they had nothing before them on which to proceed 5 and therefore admitted him to bail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE prifoner had, together with two other perfons, been 1 > & r * conviffed of a confpiracy at the laft oyer and terminer for the Clty an<* county of New-York, but had not furrendcred to his bail in time to receive fentence : he afterwards came in, and was novv brought up, on his own petition, to. have judgment pronounced; the public proiecutor appeared, but the record of [73]*73the conviction not being made up and brought into court, the bench faid they had nothing before them on which to proceed 5 and therefore admitted him to bail.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cai. Cas. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mneills-cafe-nysupct-1803.