M'Nealy v. Morrison

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 66
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1799
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 66 (M'Nealy v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M'Nealy v. Morrison, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 66 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was certainly incumbent on Sleight to have told Bowman, when he received his fBowman’s J notice of retainer, that he had received a similar notice from Smith.

[67]*67Let the default be set aside ; the costs to abide the event of the suit. *

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mnealy-v-morrison-nysupct-1799.