MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc.
This text of MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc. (MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. AP-1~];3~ / AIf\1 ~-~cum- 1y.:2 ~ 2yft '5 MMSETS/MJETS, c/o EVA SZILLERY,
Plaintiff
v. DECISION AND ORDER
LIVINGSOCIAL, INC.,
Defendant
Before the Court is the plaintiff's appeal from a judgment in Small Claims
Court requiring the parties to arbitrate plaintiff's claim. For the following
reasons, the appeal is dismissed.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 22, 2013, plaintiff filed a statement of claim against defendant
and alleged a breach of contract. Prior to the hearing date, counsel for defendant
filed a letter on May 16, 2013 and requested that the court dismiss the case in
favor of arbitration as required by the contract. On May 30, 2013, the Small
Claims Judge granted the defendant's request to dismiss the case and stated that
the claims must be arbitrated. On June 28, 2013, plaintiff filed an appeal of the
decision. M.R.S.C.P. 11.
DISCUSSION
The defendant argues that the Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to
entertain plaintiff's appeal. Under the Uniform Arbitration Act, "the court's
grant of the motion to compel arbitration is an interlocutory order that is not now
appealable." Creamer v. Bishop, 2006 ME 95 ~ 2, 902 A.2d 838. The Law Court has held that the Uniform Arbitration Act provides an exclusive list of "what
decisions concerning arbitration may be appealed." State v. Phillip Morris, Inc.,
2007 ME 90, order granting a motion to compel arbitration. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 5945(1). The entry is The Plaintiff's Appeal is DISMISSED. Dated: November 21, 2013 Nancy Mills Justice, Superior Court 6/28/13 CUMBERLAND AP-13-34 Date Filed Docket No. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___, County Action DISTRICT COURT APPEAL (SMALL CLAIM) MMSETS/MJETS LIVINGSOCIAL INC vs. Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant's Attorney c/o EVA SZILLERY c/o CORPORATION SERVICE CO 19 LEXINGTON 1090 VERMONT NORTHWEST ORONO MAINE 04473 WASHINGTON DC 20005 PRO-SE PRO-SE EBEN ALBERT-KNOPP ESQ PO BXO 9729 PORTLAND ME 04104-5029 Date of Entry
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mmsetsmjets-v-livingsocial-inc-mesuperct-2013.