MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc.

Maine Superior

MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc.

Superior Court of Maine·Decided November 21, 2013·No. CUMap-13-034·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. AP-1~];3~ /

AIf\1 ~-~cum- 1y.:2 ~ 2yft '5 MMSETS/MJETS, c/o EVA SZILLERY,

Plaintiff

v. DECISION AND ORDER LIVINGSOCIAL, INC., Defendant

Before the Court is the plaintiff's appeal from a judgment in Small Claims Court requiring the parties to arbitrate plaintiff's claim. For the following reasons, the appeal is dismissed. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 22, 2013, plaintiff filed a statement of claim against defendant and alleged a breach of contract. Prior to the hearing date, counsel for defendant filed a letter on May 16, 2013 and requested that the court dismiss the case in favor of arbitration as required by the contract. On May 30, 2013, the Small Claims Judge granted the defendant's request to dismiss the case and stated that the claims must be arbitrated. On June 28, 2013, plaintiff filed an appeal of the decision. M.R.S.C.P. 11. DISCUSSION The defendant argues that the Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff's appeal. Under the Uniform Arbitration Act, "the court's grant of the motion to compel arbitration is an interlocutory order that is not now appealable." Creamer v. Bishop, 2006 ME 95 ~ 2, 902 A.2d 838. The Law Court has held that the Uniform Arbitration Act provides an exclusive list of "what decisions concerning arbitration may be appealed." State v. Phillip Morris, Inc., 2007 ME 90, <JI 19, 928 A.2d 782. The Act does not provide for an appeal from an order granting a motion to compel arbitration. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 5945(1).

The entry is The Plaintiff's Appeal is DISMISSED.

Dated: November 21, 2013 Nancy Mills

Justice, Superior Court

6/28/13 CUMBERLAND AP-13-34 Date Filed Docket No. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___, County

Action DISTRICT COURT APPEAL (SMALL CLAIM)

MMSETS/MJETS LIVINGSOCIAL INC

vs.

Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant's Attorney c/o EVA SZILLERY c/o CORPORATION SERVICE CO 19 LEXINGTON 1090 VERMONT NORTHWEST ORONO MAINE 04473 WASHINGTON DC 20005 PRO-SE PRO-SE EBEN ALBERT-KNOPP ESQ

PO BXO 9729

PORTLAND ME 04104-5029

Date of Entry

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. AP-1~];3~ /

AIf\1 ~-~cum- 1y.:2 ~ 2yft '5 MMSETS/MJETS, c/o EVA SZILLERY,

Plaintiff

v. DECISION AND ORDER LIVINGSOCIAL, INC., Defendant

Before the Court is the plaintiff's appeal from a judgment in Small Claims Court requiring the parties to arbitrate plaintiff's claim. For the following reasons, the appeal is dismissed. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 22, 2013, plaintiff filed a statement of claim against defendant and alleged a breach of contract. Prior to the hearing date, counsel for defendant filed a letter on May 16, 2013 and requested that the court dismiss the case in favor of arbitration as required by the contract. On May 30, 2013, the Small Claims Judge granted the defendant's request to dismiss the case and stated that the claims must be arbitrated. On June 28, 2013, plaintiff filed an appeal of the decision. M.R.S.C.P. 11. DISCUSSION The defendant argues that the Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff's appeal. Under the Uniform Arbitration Act, "the court's grant of the motion to compel arbitration is an interlocutory order that is not now appealable." Creamer v. Bishop, 2006 ME 95 ~ 2, 902 A.2d 838. The Law Court has held that the Uniform Arbitration Act provides an exclusive list of "what decisions concerning arbitration may be appealed." State v. Phillip Morris, Inc., 2007 ME 90, <JI 19, 928 A.2d 782. The Act does not provide for an appeal from an order granting a motion to compel arbitration. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 5945(1).

The entry is The Plaintiff's Appeal is DISMISSED.

Dated: November 21, 2013 Nancy Mills

Justice, Superior Court

6/28/13 CUMBERLAND AP-13-34 Date Filed Docket No. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___, County

Action DISTRICT COURT APPEAL (SMALL CLAIM)

MMSETS/MJETS LIVINGSOCIAL INC

vs.

Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant's Attorney c/o EVA SZILLERY c/o CORPORATION SERVICE CO 19 LEXINGTON 1090 VERMONT NORTHWEST ORONO MAINE 04473 WASHINGTON DC 20005 PRO-SE PRO-SE EBEN ALBERT-KNOPP ESQ

PO BXO 9729

PORTLAND ME 04104-5029

Date of Entry

MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc., (Me. Super. Ct. 2013).

Pincite

MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc. (MMSets/Mjets v. Livingsocial Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related