M'Mechen v. M'Laughlin's

General Court of Virginia

M'Mechen v. M'Laughlin's

4 H. & McH. 166

CourtGeneral Court of Virginia

DecidedMay 15, 1798

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 H. & McH. 166 (M'Mechen v. M'Laughlin's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Mechen v. M'Laughlin's, 4 H. & McH. 166 (Va. Super. Ct. 1798).

Pincite

Opinion

Tüe Court. — The affidavit does not allege sufficient matter to justify the continuance of the cause under the act of assembly.

PliAXRTIEE NoKSBITKD.

Afterwards, at an adjournment of the court, the court discovered that the cause might continue without the consent of the defendant, the cause having been brought to, and the defendant having appeared at October term 1796. Whereupon the court directed the judgment of nonsuit to be struck out, and ordered the cause to be continued, with the costs of the term against the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tüe Court. — The affidavit does not allege sufficient matter to justify the continuance of the cause under the act of assembly.

PliAXRTIEE NoKSBITKD.

Afterwards, at an adjournment of the court, the court discovered that the cause might continue without the consent of the defendant, the cause having been brought to, and the defendant having appeared at October term 1796. Whereupon the court directed the judgment of nonsuit to be struck out, and ordered the cause to be continued, with the costs of the term against the plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 H. & McH. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mmechen-v-mlaughlins-vagensess-1798.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack