Mme. Apter Sutton Cleaners, Inc. v. Andrew Newman Custom Cleaners, Inc.

197 N.E.2d 626, 14 N.Y.2d 515, 248 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1366
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 20, 1964
StatusPublished

This text of 197 N.E.2d 626 (Mme. Apter Sutton Cleaners, Inc. v. Andrew Newman Custom Cleaners, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mme. Apter Sutton Cleaners, Inc. v. Andrew Newman Custom Cleaners, Inc., 197 N.E.2d 626, 14 N.Y.2d 515, 248 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1366 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to deny the motion for a stay pending arbitration, on the memorandum of the dissenting Justices at the Appellate Division and on the memorandum of the Civil Court of the City of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 N.E.2d 626, 14 N.Y.2d 515, 248 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mme-apter-sutton-cleaners-inc-v-andrew-newman-custom-cleaners-inc-ny-1964.