M.M. v. Fargo Public School Dist. 1

2012 ND 79
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided April 10, 2012·No. 20110260·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Filed 4/10/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 65

Kirby Clarence Rudolph, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

North Dakota Department of

Transportation, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20110334

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Danny Lee Herbel (argued), The Regency Business Center, 3333 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 1205, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellant.

Michael Trent Pitcher (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 North 9th Street, Bismarck, ND 58501-4509, for defendant and appellee.

Rudolph v. N.D. Dep’t of Transp.

[¶1] Kirby Clarence Rudolph appeals a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision revoking his driving privileges for three years.  Rudolph argues law enforcement did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle.  We conclude the agency’s order is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.M. v. Fargo Public School Dist. 1, 2012 ND 79 (N.D. 2012).

2012 ND 79 (M.M. v. Fargo Public School Dist. 1) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danuser v. IDA Marketing Corp.
2013 ND 196 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2013)