MM v. BD
This text of MM v. BD (MM v. BD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 16-OCT-2019 09:09 AM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
MM, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
BD, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. FC-M-14-10007)
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant MM’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August 28, 2019, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 16, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MM v. BD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mm-v-bd-haw-2019.