Mlotkowski v. Cinnamon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mlotkowski v. Cinnamon

232 A.D. 788

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 788 (Mlotkowski v. Cinnamon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mlotkowski v. Cinnamon, 232 A.D. 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the refusal of the court to charge, to which exception was taken, to the effect that if the jury should find that the hole in the door was the proximate cause of the injury, the plaintiffs could recover, was error. Present ■—■ Dowling, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the refusal of the court to charge, to which exception was taken, to the effect that if the jury should find that the hole in the door was the proximate cause of the injury, the plaintiffs could recover, was error. Present ■—■ Dowling, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mlotkowski-v-cinnamon-nyappdiv-1931.