MLlaughlin v. Fowler

California Supreme Court

MLlaughlin v. Fowler

52 Cal. 203

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1877

DocketNo. 5037

StatusPublished

This text of 52 Cal. 203 (MLlaughlin v. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MLlaughlin v. Fowler, 52 Cal. 203 (Cal. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, McKinstby, J.:

The determination of this case depends upon the proper construction of certain statutes of the United States. The precise question presented has been passed upon by the Supreme Court of the United States, in Newhall v. Sanger, 92 U. S. R. 761. Newhall v. Sanger overrules Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. Yolland; Same v. Robinson, and Raiser v. McLaughlin, 49 Cal. 438, 446, 449.

Judgment and order affirmed.

¡Neither Mr. Chief Justice Wallace nor Mr. Justice Rhodes -expressed an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, McKinstby, J.:

The determination of this case depends upon the proper construction of certain statutes of the United States. The precise question presented has been passed upon by the Supreme Court of the United States, in Newhall v. Sanger, 92 U. S. R. 761. Newhall v. Sanger overrules Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. Yolland; Same v. Robinson, and Raiser v. McLaughlin, 49 Cal. 438, 446, 449.

Judgment and order affirmed.

¡Neither Mr. Chief Justice Wallace nor Mr. Justice Rhodes -expressed an opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Cal. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mllaughlin-v-fowler-cal-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack