M.L. v. State
842 So. 2d 257, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4834
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2935·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant, M.L., challenges the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of carrying a concealed weapon. Because the State presented no evidence that M.L. either used or intended to use the box cutter found in his possession as a deadly weapon, we reverse his judgment and sentence as to that offense, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See T.S. v. State, 734 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Robinson v. State, 547 So.2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M.L. v. State, 842 So. 2d 257, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
842 So. 2d 257 (M.L. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cook v. Crosby
914 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Walthour
876 So. 2d 594 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)