ML v. State
This text of 842 So. 2d 257 (ML v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.L., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, M.L., challenges the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of carrying a concealed weapon. Because the State presented no evidence that M.L. either used or intended to use the box cutter found in his possession as a deadly weapon, we reverse his judgment and sentence as to that offense, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See T.S. v. State, 734 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Robinson v. State, 547 So.2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
Reversed and remanded.
BARFIELD, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
842 So. 2d 257, 2003 WL 1831128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ml-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.