Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento County

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 25, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-01405·Unknown

Opinion

] 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ARAM MKRTCHYAN, Case No. 2:25-cv-01405-DJC-CSK 10 Plaintiff, 11 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED V. PROTECTIVE ORDER

13 || SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., (ECF No. 12) 14 Defendants. 15 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 12), and 17 || finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The 18 || Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. 19 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 20 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 21 || 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. 22 || Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for 23 || disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain 24 ||jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. 25 26 || Dated: July 24, 2025 C (yi S$ 27 CHI SOO KIM 38 || 5. mert405.25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

2 Patrick H. Dwyer, SBN 137743 LAW OFFICE OF PATRICK H. DWYER 3 P.O. Box 1705 Penn Valley, CA 95946 4 TEL: 530.432.5407 5 FAX: 530.432.9122 pdwyer@pdwyerlaw.com 6 Attorney for Plaintiff Aram Mkrtchyan

7 Matthew W. Gross, SBN 324007 8 mgross@porterscott.com Jeffery M. Isaacs, SBN 338853 9 jisaacs@porterscott.com 2100 Harvard Street, Suite 500 10 Sacramento, California 95815 11 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 12 Attorneys for Defendants SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Officer Dugdale and Does 1-10 13

15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16

17 ARAM MKRTCHYAN, an individual, CASE NO. 2:25-cv-01405-DJC-CSK

18 Plaintiff [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 19 20 v. Complaint Filed: 05/19/2025

21 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, a county government and the operator of 22 the Sacramento County Sheriff’s 23 Department; SCSD Officer Max Dugdale, and 24 Does 1-10, in their individual capacity,

25 Defendants. 26 ___________________________________/

28 1 A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which protection from public disclosure and from use for any 4 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate 5 to, and petition the court to enter, the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that 6 this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 7 protection it affords extends only to the limited extent such information or items are entitled to confidential 8 treatment under the applicable federal law, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability 9 Act (“HIPAA”) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties further acknowledge that this 10 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal. Civil Local 11 Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 12 party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 13 B. STIPULATION 14 The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 15 1. DOCUMENTS. The following documents are “Protected Materials” and shall not be used 16 for any purpose other than this litigation: 17 (a) all video covering Plaintiff at the Sacramento County Rio Consumnes Correctional 18 Facility (“RCCC”) from the time Plaintiff was brought to RCCC prior to November 1, 2024, until date of 19 filing of the Complaint; 20 (b) any incident report or investigation concerning the allegations in the Complaint.; 21 (c) all medical records, including x-rays, for Plaintiff while at the Sacramento County 22 jail; 23 (d) plaintiff’s past and current medical records; 24 (e) medical billings, insurance information and evidence of payments made; 25 (f) personnel files of any peace officer or medical personnel involved in this case; 26 (g) any Internal Affairs Investigation materials from the Sacramento County Sheriff’s 27 Dept.; 28 (h) Sacramento County Correctional Health policies; 1 (i) Sacramento County Sheriff Dept. Policies; and 2 (j) if a party wants to designate a document other than what is identified above as 3 confidential under this Protective Order, the procedure set forth in Sections D and E shall be followed. 4 2. SCOPE 5 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material, but 6 also: (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, 7 or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties 8 or their Counsel of Record that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by 9 this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public 10 domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its 11 disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including 12 becoming part of the public record through court order, trial, or otherwise; and (b) any information known 13 to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from 14 a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the 15 Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or 16 order. 17 3. DURATION 18 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order 19 shall remain in effect until: (1) a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing; (2) a court order otherwise 20 directs; or (3) there is a complete return or destruction of all Protected Material pursuant to Section 8. 21 Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of: (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, 22 with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, 23 rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or 24 applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 25 4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 26 4.1 Basic Principles 27 A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or 28 1 by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this 2 litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 3 conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must 4 comply with the provisions of section 8 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored 5 and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited 6 to the persons authorized under this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento County, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento County (Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.