M'Kinzie v. Smith

Superior Court of North Carolina

M'Kinzie v. Smith

3 N.C. 372

DecidedNovember 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 372 (M'Kinzie v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Kinzie v. Smith, 3 N.C. 372 (N.C. Ct. App. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

Loche, Judge,

however, rr; cf c, contrary opinion, ando ltd he ought not to be charged with interest, for that he was not bound to refund exceeding the value he had received • s.i.l it:dependent of that, an executor delivering over the property, was liable to creditors for the value, and no more,

N.B. In the suit of Hostler’s executors vs. Smith, executor of Rowan, defendant, pleaded, that the property tiras delivered over in 15T83, to MfK'uisie and others — —and Loche derided, that such delivery over did not amount to an adruHiistnuton ; ■máúie more so, as Smith had notice of Hostlei’s debt-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loche, Judge,

however, rr; cf c, contrary opinion, ando ltd he ought not to be charged with interest, for that he was not bound to refund exceeding the value he had received • s.i.l it:dependent of that, an executor delivering over the property, was liable to creditors for the value, and no more,

N.B. In the suit of Hostler’s executors vs. Smith, executor of Rowan, defendant, pleaded, that the property tiras delivered over in 15T83, to MfK'uisie and others — —and Loche derided, that such delivery over did not amount to an adruHiistnuton ; ■máúie more so, as Smith had notice of Hostlei’s debt-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mkinzie-v-smith-ncsuperct-1805.