M'Kinney v. Watson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

M'Kinney v. Watson

8 Serg. & Rawle 347

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 12, 1822

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 Serg. & Rawle 347 (M'Kinney v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Kinney v. Watson, 8 Serg. & Rawle 347 (Pa. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The administratrix had nothing to do with the'real estate of the intestate, or with the support and maintenance of the children. She is therefore not entitled to credit in ber administration account, for any money expended on account of the real estate or of the children. But the supplemental account consists altogether of charges relating to these two articles. The decree of the Orphans’ Court, therefore, so far as regards the supplemental account, must be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The administratrix had nothing to do with the'real estate of the intestate, or with the support and maintenance of the children. She is therefore not entitled to credit in ber administration account, for any money expended on account of the real estate or of the children. But the supplemental account consists altogether of charges relating to these two articles. The decree of the Orphans’ Court, therefore, so far as regards the supplemental account, must be reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Serg. & Rawle 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mkinney-v-watson-pa-1822.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack