M'Kinney v. Watson
8 Serg. & Rawle 347
Opinion
The administratrix had nothing to do with the'real estate of the intestate, or with the support and maintenance of the children. She is therefore not entitled to credit in ber administration account, for any money expended on account of the real estate or of the children. But the supplemental account consists altogether of charges relating to these two articles. The decree of the Orphans’ Court, therefore, so far as regards the supplemental account, must be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M'Kinney v. Watson, 8 Serg. & Rawle 347 (Pa. 1822).
8 Serg. & Rawle 347 (M'Kinney v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clauser's Estate
1 Watts & Serg. 208 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1841)
King v. Morrison
1 Pen. & W. 188 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1829)