M'Kenster v. Van Zandt
1 Wend. 13
Opinion
The process was void, and must be set aside with costs. The notice of motion signed D. B. attorney for defendant, was a sufficient notice of retainer. (3 Caines, 133.) After the appearance of the defendant, the rule for discontinuance, without the payment of the defendant’s costs, was a nullity. (10 Johns. R. 367.) The motion is granted on the defendant’s stipulating not to bring an action of false imprisonment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M'Kenster v. Van Zandt, 1 Wend. 13 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
1 Wend. 13 (M'Kenster v. Van Zandt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Robinson
123 Misc. 80 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
Jaworower v. Rovere
98 Misc. 377 (New York Supreme Court, 1917)
Couch v. Mulhane
63 How. Pr. 79 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1882)
Martine v. Lowenstein
13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 225 (New York Supreme Court, 1875)
Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Leuling
7 Abb. Pr. 37 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)
Young v. Bush
36 How. Pr. 240 (New York Supreme Court, 1868)
Warren v. Eddy
13 Abb. Pr. 28 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Pignolet v. Daveau
2 Hilt. 584 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1860)
Averill v. . Patterson
10 N.Y. 500 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)
Bedell v. Powell
13 Barb. 183 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Huntington v. Forkson
7 Hill & Den. 195 (New York Supreme Court, 1845)
Smith v. White
7 Hill & Den. 520 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
White v. Smith
4 Hill & Den. 166 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1843)
Harden v. Hardick
2 Hill & Den. 384 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)
James v. Delevan
7 Wend. 511 (New York Supreme Court, 1832)