M'Kee's Leffee v. Pfout
This text of 3 U.S. 486 (M'Kee's Leffee v. Pfout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court flopped Ingerfoll, when he was about to reply, 'and delivered their opinion as follows.
We entertain no doubt on the prefent queilion. Tne Legiflature has, at various periods, and on a variety of fubjetfts, departed from feudal ceremonies and principles, in relation to the transfer and defeent of property: but, in the. prefent inftance, the ail of Aflembly meant only to give to a grant of lands, a greater effeil upon the eftate, on recording the deed, than could previo fly have been enjoyed, without livery of feizen; It never contemplated that ci.rcum-ilunce, as an inftiument to work a forfeiture, on the common law doftrine of alienation bv tenant for life, or years.
.Shippen, Jyflice. F ro n the words of the ail of Aflembly., it is plain, I think, that the Legiflature did not mean to work the forfeiture of a particular eftate, by the provifion for recording deeds. In allowing to deeds recorded the fame torce and effeit, as feoffments with livery, the intention is exprefslv re- *490 ftrifled to “giving poffeffion and feifen, and making good the title and aflurance of lands, tenements, and hereditaments.
It is, therefore, merely a facility and benefit extended to the grantee.
Judgment for the Plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 U.S. 486, 3 Dall. 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mkees-leffee-v-pfout-scotus-1798.