M'Keel's Lessee v. Woolford

4 H. & McH. 495
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 15, 1766·Published

Opinion

He said that tbe case of Col. Mason vs. Spalding, (a) was the first case, wherein a deed of bargain and sale executed off the land, was held to be void. That after purchased, land will not pass, unless the will is republished — ho cited 1 Font. 207, Mote. If the devisor has an equitable estate in lands, they will pass by general and sweeping words in a will. — 1 Cha. Ca. 39. 2 Ch. Ca. 144. Mosley 262. 123. 1 Vez. 437, 494. Pr. Ch. 320. 2 P. Will. 629. 1 Bro. Rep. 226, 227. There is no disseisin unless there be an actual expulsion. — Co. Litt. 181. 1 Salk. 246. The consequences of actual disseisins, considered as such, continue law to this .day. The disseisee cannot dispose or devise; the descent takes away his entry.: — 1 Burr. 112.

The Plaintiff suffered a nonsuit.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M'Keel's Lessee v. Woolford, 4 H. & McH. 495 (Md. 1766).

4 H. & McH. 495 (M'Keel's Lessee v. Woolford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.