M.K. v. Goss

D.C. Circuit

M.K. v. Goss

167 F. App'x 816

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedSeptember 27, 2005

DocketNo. 04-5415

StatusPublished

This text of 167 F. App'x 816 (M.K. v. Goss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M.K. v. Goss, 167 F. App'x 816 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

[817]*817 JUDGMENT

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the orders of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in its memorandum order of September 16, 2004 and order of September 21, 2004.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[817]*817 JUDGMENT

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the orders of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in its memorandum order of September 16, 2004 and order of September 21, 2004.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 F. App'x 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mk-v-goss-cadc-2005.