M&K Imports, LLC v. Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc.

S.D. New York

M&K Imports, LLC v. Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 31, 2022·No. 7:22-cv-02606·Unknown

Opinion

x carats een DULSILIRE at ce temas USBC SpNy i} DOC NY □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT if RLF □□ EN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK I A NSAI Ber py i M&K IMPORTS, LLC, | 3 i Plaintiff, om a2

V. ORDER REJUVENADA MEDICAL GROUP, INC., : d/b/a REGENEVADA; THOM E. LOBE; : 22 CV 2606 (VB) PATRICK D. CROCKER; and CROCKER LAW FIRM PLLC a/k/a CROCKER & : CROCKER, : Defendants. re ne een ee een eee nen een eee ee eee eX Plaintiff brings this action invoking subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. To invoke diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there must be complete diversity of citizenship. Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68 (1996). Thus, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 “applies only to cases in which the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant.” Id.; see also Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 89 (2005). Specifically, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) applies when the dispute is between “citizens of different States.” A limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its individual or entity members. Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000). Here, plaintiff, a limited liability company, alleges it is organized in New York and with a principal place of business in Mount Vernon, New York. (Doc. #1 4 13). Plaintiff also alleges defendant Crocker Law Firm PLLC, a professional limited liability company, is organized in Michigan and “maintains a business address” in Kalamazoo, Michigan. (Id. { 18). Plaintiff does not identify its members, or their citizenships, or the members of defendant Crocker Law Firm PLLC, or their citizenships.

Accordingly, by April 7, 2022, plaintiff's counsel shall submit a letter explaining in detail the citizenship of plaintiff and defendant Crocker Law Firm PLLC, so that the Court can determine whether it has subject matter jurisdiction. Dated: March 31, 2022 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

x carats een DULSILIRE at ce temas USBC SpNy i} DOC NY □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT if RLF □□ EN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK I A NSAI Ber py i M&K IMPORTS, LLC, | 3 i Plaintiff, om a2

V. ORDER REJUVENADA MEDICAL GROUP, INC., : d/b/a REGENEVADA; THOM E. LOBE; : 22 CV 2606 (VB) PATRICK D. CROCKER; and CROCKER LAW FIRM PLLC a/k/a CROCKER & : CROCKER, : Defendants. re ne een ee een eee nen een eee ee eee eX Plaintiff brings this action invoking subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. To invoke diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there must be complete diversity of citizenship. Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68 (1996). Thus, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 “applies only to cases in which the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant.” Id.; see also Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 89 (2005). Specifically, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) applies when the dispute is between “citizens of different States.” A limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its individual or entity members. Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000). Here, plaintiff, a limited liability company, alleges it is organized in New York and with a principal place of business in Mount Vernon, New York. (Doc. #1 4 13). Plaintiff also alleges defendant Crocker Law Firm PLLC, a professional limited liability company, is organized in Michigan and “maintains a business address” in Kalamazoo, Michigan. (Id. { 18). Plaintiff does not identify its members, or their citizenships, or the members of defendant Crocker Law Firm PLLC, or their citizenships.

Accordingly, by April 7, 2022, plaintiff's counsel shall submit a letter explaining in detail the citizenship of plaintiff and defendant Crocker Law Firm PLLC, so that the Court can determine whether it has subject matter jurisdiction. Dated: March 31, 2022 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

M&K Imports, LLC v. Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

M&K Imports, LLC v. Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc. (M&K Imports, LLC v. Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related