Mizrach v. United States

678 F. App'x 179
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 2017
DocketNo. 16-1550, No. 16-1551
StatusPublished

This text of 678 F. App'x 179 (Mizrach v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mizrach v. United States, 678 F. App'x 179 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Mizrach appeals the district court’s orders denying several post-judgment motions he filed following the dismissal of two Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mizrach v. United States, Nos. 1:11-cv-01153-RDB; 1:08-cv-02030-AMD, 2016 WL 7012668, 2016 WL 1446724 (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2015; Apr. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2671-2680
28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680
§ 2671
28 U.S.C. § 2671

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 F. App'x 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mizrach-v-united-states-ca4-2017.