Mizen v. Utica Natl. Ins. Group

Ohio Supreme Court

Mizen v. Utica Natl. Ins. Group

764 N.E.2d 441, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1496

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 8, 2002

Docket02-383

StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 441 (Mizen v. Utica Natl. Ins. Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mizen v. Utica Natl. Ins. Group, 764 N.E.2d 441, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1496 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 79554. This cause was filed by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company on March 4, 2002, as an appeal from the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals entered on February 4, 2002, in Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals No. 79554. This appeal was preceded by the filing of case No. 02-377, an appeal from the same judgment, filed by Republic-Franldin Insurance Company on March 4, 2002. Whereas the second notice of appeal by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company was inadvertently filed as a separate case,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction filed by Nationwide Insurance Company in this case shall be filed and docketed as a second notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction in case No. 02-377 effective March 4, 2002; this case is dismissed; and the parties shall now proceed in case No. 02-377 in accordance with 5. Ct.Prac.R. III.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 79554. This cause was filed by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company on March 4, 2002, as an appeal from the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals entered on February 4, 2002, in Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals No. 79554. This appeal was preceded by the filing of case No. 02-377, an appeal from the same judgment, filed by Republic-Franldin Insurance Company on March 4, 2002. Whereas the second notice of appeal by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company was inadvertently filed as a separate case,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction filed by Nationwide Insurance Company in this case shall be filed and docketed as a second notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction in case No. 02-377 effective March 4, 2002; this case is dismissed; and the parties shall now proceed in case No. 02-377 in accordance with 5. Ct.Prac.R. III.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 N.E.2d 441, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mizen-v-utica-natl-ins-group-ohio-2002.