Mizell v. Travelers Insurance

40 Fla. 148
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 Fla. 148 (Mizell v. Travelers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mizell v. Travelers Insurance, 40 Fla. 148 (Fla. 1898).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This cause coming on to be heard on motion and agreement of counsel of all the parties to amend the transcript of the record and the abstracts of record by .inserting matter alleged to have been inadvertently omitted therefrom, and it appearing to the court that the amendments sought to be made are additions to the bill of exceptions contained in the transcript of record, and if allowed will change and vary such bill ^f exceptions as certified by the Circuit Judge, which can not be permitted to be done in an appellate court, even by consent of parties. The motion is, therefore, denied. Glaser, Kuder & Ottensoser v. Hackett, 38 Fla. 84, 20 South. Rep. 820, and cases cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curry v. Osborne
77 So. 616 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Weeks v. Hays
55 Fla. 370 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Fla. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mizell-v-travelers-insurance-fla-1898.