Mizell v. Sara Lee Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Mizell v. Sara Lee Corp.

158 F. App'x 424

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 13, 2005

DocketNo. 05-1754

StatusPublished

This text of 158 F. App'x 424 (Mizell v. Sara Lee Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mizell v. Sara Lee Corp., 158 F. App'x 424 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tammy S. Mizell appeals the district court’s order denying Mizell’s breach of employment contract claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mizell v. Sara Lee Corp., No. CA-05-129-2-JBF (E.D. Va. June 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tammy S. Mizell appeals the district court’s order denying Mizell’s breach of employment contract claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mizell v. Sara Lee Corp., No. CA-05-129-2-JBF (E.D. Va. June 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 F. App'x 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mizell-v-sara-lee-corp-ca4-2005.