Mizell v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Mizell v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

91 S.E. 856, 173 N.C. 695, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 375

DecidedFebruary 21, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 856 (Mizell v. Norfolk Southern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mizell v. Norfolk Southern Railroad, 91 S.E. 856, 173 N.C. 695, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 375 (N.C. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cubiam.

There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the judgment of nonsuit was properly overruled.

We have examined the other exceptions, and find nothing in them which would justify a new trial or which require discussion.

The son of the plaintiff, about 8 years of age, accompanied the plaintiff at the time of her injury, and he instituted an action in which he recovered $25, and as the same questions arise, the same disposition is made of the appeal in the action in which he is the plaintiff.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cubiam.

There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the judgment of nonsuit was properly overruled.

We have examined the other exceptions, and find nothing in them which would justify a new trial or which require discussion.

The son of the plaintiff, about 8 years of age, accompanied the plaintiff at the time of her injury, and he instituted an action in which he recovered $25, and as the same questions arise, the same disposition is made of the appeal in the action in which he is the plaintiff.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 856, 173 N.C. 695, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mizell-v-norfolk-southern-railroad-nc-1917.