Mizell v. Bates

435 So. 2d 1274, 1983 Ala. LEXIS 4691
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 5, 1983·No. 81-1035·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed as to Appellee Bay Minette Church of Christ on the authority of Holliyan v. Gayle, 404 So.2d 31 (Ala.1981) (where [1275] movant for summary judgment meets pri-ma facie showing as to lack of genuine issue of material fact and non-moving party fails to produce any evidence, court must grant summary judgment if movant is entitled to judgment as matter of law under undisputed facts). Affirmed as to Appellee R.C. Bates on the authority of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Boyer, 357 So.2d 958 (Ala.1978) (where entire closing argument was not included in record, context of what was said insufficient to justify conclusion of improper argument).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mizell v. Bates, 435 So. 2d 1274, 1983 Ala. LEXIS 4691 (Ala. 1983).

435 So. 2d 1274 (Mizell v. Bates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Boyer
357 So. 2d 958 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1978)
Holliyan v. Gayle
404 So. 2d 31 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)