Mizell & Brother v. Satilla Turpentine Co.

78 S.E. 335, 140 Ga. 46, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 21
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

The evidence submitted in behalf of the plaintiff failing to make out a prima facie case, a nonsuit was properly granted.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mizell & Brother v. Satilla Turpentine Co., 78 S.E. 335, 140 Ga. 46, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 21 (Ga. 1913).

78 S.E. 335 (Mizell & Brother v. Satilla Turpentine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ables v. Motor Contract Company
36 S.E.2d 148 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Ables v. Motor Contract Co.
200 Ga. 30 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)