Mizell & Brother v. Satilla Turpentine Co.

78 S.E. 335, 140 Ga. 46, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 21
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 78 S.E. 335 (Mizell & Brother v. Satilla Turpentine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mizell & Brother v. Satilla Turpentine Co., 78 S.E. 335, 140 Ga. 46, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 21 (Ga. 1913).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The evidence submitted in behalf of the plaintiff failing to make out a prima facie case, a nonsuit was properly granted.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ables v. Motor Contract Company
36 S.E.2d 148 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Ables v. Motor Contract Co.
200 Ga. 30 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.E. 335, 140 Ga. 46, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mizell-brother-v-satilla-turpentine-co-ga-1913.