Mize v. State Division of Human Rights

294 N.E.2d 851, 31 N.Y.2d 1032, 342 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1468, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8629, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 830
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1973·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

On the cross appeal by petitioners: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that petitioners were not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]; see Zachary v. Macy & Co., 31 N Y 2d 443). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen, Jones and Wachtler. Taking no part: Judges Breitel and Gabrielli.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mize v. State Division of Human Rights, 294 N.E.2d 851, 31 N.Y.2d 1032, 342 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1468, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8629, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 830 (N.Y. 1973).

294 N.E.2d 851 (Mize v. State Division of Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of Education
458 N.E.2d 1241 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
ARIZONA CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, ETC. v. Olson
643 P.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1982)
State Division of Human Rights v. Syracuse City Teachers Ass'n
66 A.D.2d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Town of West Hartford v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
407 A.2d 964 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1978)
State Division of Human Rights v. City of Niagara Falls
61 A.D.2d 1128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)