Mize v. Mize

623 So. 2d 636, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9430, 1993 WL 355057
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mize v. Mize. Read the opinion of the Court — 589 So. 2d 959
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1993·No. No. 91-57·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was remanded to us for reconsideration by the Supreme Court after it [637]*637quashed our decision in Mize v. Mize, 589 So.2d 959 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993). We were directed to consider only the issue of the removal to California of the parties’ child when the mother changed her residency from Florida to that state.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Special Master were adopted in their entirety by the trial court and appear to satisfy the Hill1 factors adopted by the Supreme Court as a method of determining whether removal from this state is allowable. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s December 14, 1990 Final Order on Petition for Modification of Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage which provides for liberal and frequent visitation by the father and for costs of transportation to be borne by the mother.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mize v. Mize, 623 So. 2d 636, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9430, 1993 WL 355057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

623 So. 2d 636 (Mize v. Mize) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mize v. Mize
621 So. 2d 417 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Mize v. Mize
589 So. 2d 959 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Hill v. Hill
548 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)