Mize v. Brewer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mize v. Brewer

25 S.E. 700, 99 Ga. 322

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 24, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 700 (Mize v. Brewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mize v. Brewer, 25 S.E. 700, 99 Ga. 322 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

An affidavit to appeal in forma pauperis from a judgment rendered by a county court, upon which, affidavit was an entry of filing duly signed by the county judge, and which was in all respects complete except that it lacked the signature of the county judge to the jurat, was amendable by supplying the deficiency; and it was therefore error not to allow the appellant to show by that judge that the failure to sign was a clerical omission, and also error to refuse to allow him to sign the jurat instanter. Judgment reversed.

Ira G. Van Duzer, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

An affidavit to appeal in forma pauperis from a judgment rendered by a county court, upon which, affidavit was an entry of filing duly signed by the county judge, and which was in all respects complete except that it lacked the signature of the county judge to the jurat, was amendable by supplying the deficiency; and it was therefore error not to allow the appellant to show by that judge that the failure to sign was a clerical omission, and also error to refuse to allow him to sign the jurat instanter. Judgment reversed.

Ira G. Van Duzer, for plaintiff in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 S.E. 700, 99 Ga. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mize-v-brewer-ga-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack