Miyachi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJune 23, 2025
Docket21-1046V
StatusPublished

This text of Miyachi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Miyachi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miyachi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

************************* NAHO MIYACHI, * * No. 21-1046V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * * Filed: May 27, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * ************************* Kathleen Margaret Loucks, Lommen Abdo Law Firm, Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner; Voris Edward Johnson, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On May 23, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Naho Miyachi on March 10, 2021. Petitioner alleged that the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine she received on April 5, 2018, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused her to suffer from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted on the website. or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury or any other injury; and denies that her current condition is a sequala of a vaccine-related injury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $45,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(a). In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS __________________________________________ ) NAHO MIYACHI, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 21-1046V (ECF) v. ) Special Master Moran ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. On March 10, 2021, Naho Miyachi (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10

to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related

to petitioner’s receipt of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine, which vaccine

is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a Tdap vaccine on April 5, 2018.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) within the time period set forth in the Table following administration

of the vaccine, or in the alternative that her alleged injuries were caused-in-fact by the vaccine. 1

1 Petitioner initially alleged brachial neuritis as her injury, but she later amended her petition to allege a Table SIRVA and/or an off-Table shoulder injury. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than

six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the

Tdap vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that her

current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment, which represents compensation for all damages

that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):

A lump sum of $45,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner.

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

2 10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. §

1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miyachi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miyachi-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.