Mixon v. Tyrrell County Public Schools
This text of Mixon v. Tyrrell County Public Schools (Mixon v. Tyrrell County Public Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1103
MARK MIXON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TYRRELL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-00031-H)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 2, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Mixon, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Hudson Allen, III, THARRINGTON & SMITH, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mark Mixon appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint without prejudice for insufficient
service of process. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Mixon v. Tyrrell County Public Schools,
No. 2:07-cv-00031-H (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mixon v. Tyrrell County Public Schools, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mixon-v-tyrrell-county-public-schools-ca4-2009.