Mixon v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mixon v. State

194 S.E. 903, 185 Ga. 331, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 414

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1938·No. No. 12151·Published

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

The evidence in this record is sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. Accordingly, the judgment overruling the motion for new trial based solely on the general grounds will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Duncan Graham and Lewis & Chapman, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, W. H. Lanier, solicitor-general, B. G. Arnall, and B. J. Glower, contra. ' .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

The evidence in this record is sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. Accordingly, the judgment overruling the motion for new trial based solely on the general grounds will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Duncan Graham and Lewis & Chapman, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, W. H. Lanier, solicitor-general, B. G. Arnall, and B. J. Glower, contra. ' .

Mixon v. State, 194 S.E. 903, 185 Ga. 331, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 414 (Ga. 1938).

Pincite

194 S.E. 903 (Mixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.