Mixon v. State
Opinion
Appellant’s conviction is AFFIRMED. The error, if any, in admitting the victim’s out-of-court statement to Deputy Bates, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. A harmless error analysis applies to the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez-Marrero, 390 F.3d 1, 17-18 (1st Cir.2004); United States v. Jones, 393 F.3d 107, 109 (2d Cir.2004); United States v. Robinson, 389 F.3d 582, 593 (6th Cir.2004); United States v. Gilbert, 391 F.3d 882, 884 (7th Cir.2004); Williams v. United States, 858 A.2d 978, 981 (D.C.2004); Porter v. State, 278 Ga. 694, 606 S.E.2d 240, 243 (2004); Vigil v. State, 98 P.3d 172, 179 (Wyo.2004); [497] Somervell v. State, 883 So.2d 836, 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
899 So. 2d 496 (Mixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.