Mixon v. State
This text of 70 So. 949 (Mixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was tried under a complaint charging that he “manufactured, sold, kept for sale, gave away, or otherwise disposed of spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors without a license and contrary to law.” There is no evidence in the case showing or tending to show, that he sold, kept for sale, or otherwise disposed of prohibited liquors; but the evidence shows without dispute that the defendant had constructed a crude still out of a lard can and a water pipe, and had placed therein beer made from cane syrup and water, and was attempting to make whisky, but that, in fact, he had not manufactured a single drop. The appellant admits that he had made an attempt to manufacture prohibited liquors; but this is not an offense under our statutes. — Acts 1915, pp. 3, 8.
The evidence in the case was not sufficient to authorize a conviction.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 So. 949, 14 Ala. App. 11, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mixon-v-state-alactapp-1916.