Mixon v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools

Fourth Circuit

Mixon v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools

473 F. App'x 271

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 30, 2012·No. No. 11-2259·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mary Roslyn Mixon appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting the Defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mixon v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schs., No. 3:11-cv-00228-MOC-DSC, 2011 WL 5075622 (W.D.N.C, Oct. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mary Roslyn Mixon appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting the Defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mixon v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schs., No. 3:11-cv-00228-MOC-DSC, 2011 WL 5075622 (W.D.N.C, Oct. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mixon v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools, 473 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

473 F. App'x 271 (Mixon v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.