Mixon v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools
This text of 473 F. App'x 271 (Mixon v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary Roslyn Mixon appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting the Defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mixon v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schs., No. 3:11-cv-00228-MOC-DSC, 2011 WL 5075622 (W.D.N.C, Oct. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 F. App'x 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mixon-v-charlotte-mecklenburg-schools-ca4-2012.