Mixer v. Modern Woodmen of America

197 N.W. 129, 111 Neb. 334, 1923 Neb. LEXIS 114
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1923·No. No. 22635·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in Garrison v. Modern Woodmen of America, 105 Neb. 25, Coverdale v. Royal Arcanum, 193 Ill. 91, and Boynton v. Modern Woodmen of America, 148 Minn. 150, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mixer v. Modern Woodmen of America, 197 N.W. 129, 111 Neb. 334, 1923 Neb. LEXIS 114 (Neb. 1923).

197 N.W. 129 (Mixer v. Modern Woodmen of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robertson v. Security Benefit Assn.
114 S.W.2d 1009 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1938)
Green v. Royal Neighbors of America
73 P.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1937)
Modern Woodmen of America v. Crudup
1935 OK 985 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
DeVore-Norton v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
1928 OK 454 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)