Mixell v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Mixell v. Bradford

2 Serg. & Rawle 488

DecidedSeptember 10, 1816

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Serg. & Rawle 488 (Mixell v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mixell v. Bradford, 2 Serg. & Rawle 488 (Pa. 1816).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court below are the judges, whether •new evidence was given or not, and it appears, that they did make a special decision on the subject of costs. This Court cannot inquire into the fact of new evidence being given or not. When the Court below decided, that the defendant should recover costs, their judgment was founded on the fact, that no new evidence had been given by the defendant. We see no error in the record, and therefore the judgment must he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Court below are the judges, whether •new evidence was given or not, and it appears, that they did make a special decision on the subject of costs. This Court cannot inquire into the fact of new evidence being given or not. When the Court below decided, that the defendant should recover costs, their judgment was founded on the fact, that no new evidence had been given by the defendant. We see no error in the record, and therefore the judgment must he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Serg. & Rawle 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mixell-v-bradford-pa-1816.