MIX v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OHIO

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided April 9, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00126·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

ERICA SHANEE MIX, CASE NO. 2:21-CV-126 Petitioner, JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura v.

WARDEN, OHIO REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN,

Respondent.

ORDER

On March 16, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that this action be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Petitioner has waived the right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court therefore DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 9, 2021 _____s/James L. Graham_______ JAMES L. GRAHAM United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MIX v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OHIO, (S.D. Ohio 2021).

MIX v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OHIO (MIX v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OHIO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related