Mix v. San Diego & Cuyamaca Railroad

24 P. 1027, 86 Cal. 235, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1011
California Supreme Court·Decided October 27, 1890·No. No. 13857·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Works, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. A statement of the case is copied into the transcript, but it does not appear to have been filed in the court below after it was settled. This being so, it is no part of the record, and cannot be looked to in aid of this appeal; and as the only ruling complained of depends upon the evidence given at the trial, the position taken by the appellant has nothing to support it. (Mills v. Dearborn, 82 Cal. 51, 55.) Besides, it does not appear that the statement was used on motion for a new trial, and for that reason it cannot be the basis of an appeal from the judgment. (Jue Fook Sam v. Lord, 83 Cal. 160.) Judgment affirmed.

Fox, J., and Paterson, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mix v. San Diego & Cuyamaca Railroad, 24 P. 1027, 86 Cal. 235, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1011 (Cal. 1890).

24 P. 1027 (Mix v. San Diego & Cuyamaca Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells v. Kreyenhagen
49 P. 128 (California Supreme Court, 1897)