Mix Centre, Ltd. v. Butler

221 A.D.2d 182, 633 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered on or about June 1, 1994, which denied petitioner’s application to confirm an arbitration award, and granted respondent’s cross motion to vacate the award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The award was properly vacated pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) (2) (ii) since respondent was not bound by an arbitration clause or designation of an agent for service of process contained in an agreement that was not signed by him, or anyone else other than petitioner, and did not even mention his name. Nor did respondent participate in the arbitration hearing when an attorney appeared on his behalf and did nothing more than request an adjournment (see, Matter of Fair v Continental Ins. Co., 203 AD2d 364; Matter of IMG Publ. [Viesti], 170 AD2d 268). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Asch and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mix Centre, Ltd. v. Butler, 221 A.D.2d 182, 633 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

221 A.D.2d 182 (Mix Centre, Ltd. v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of City of Cortland v. Cortland Police Benevolent Assn.
2004 NY Slip Op 50196(U) (New York Supreme Court, Cortland County, 2004)
In Re the Arbitration Between Blamowski & Munson Transportation, Inc.
690 N.E.2d 1254 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)