Mitzas v. Spector

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Mitzas v. Spector

125 Misc. 923, 212 N.Y.S. 295, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1111

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 125 Misc. 923 (Mitzas v. Spector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitzas v. Spector, 125 Misc. 923, 212 N.Y.S. 295, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This cause, after a new trial had been granted, was, by an order entered April 13, 1925, directed to be placed upon the next trial calendar. For some unexplained reason plaintiff’s counsel did not present this order to the calendar clerk until May sixth. It was then placed upon the calendar for June 1, 1925, instead of the calendar May 1,1925. (See Rules of the City Court of the City of New York, rule 14.) Since it was thus irregularly upon the calendar defendants were entitled to have their resulting default opened without terms, and the order appealed from is modified accordingly.

Order modified by striking therefrom all conditions for the payment of costs, and order as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants to abide the event.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This cause, after a new trial had been granted, was, by an order entered April 13, 1925, directed to be placed upon the next trial calendar. For some unexplained reason plaintiff’s counsel did not present this order to the calendar clerk until May sixth. It was then placed upon the calendar for June 1, 1925, instead of the calendar May 1,1925. (See Rules of the City Court of the City of New York, rule 14.) Since it was thus irregularly upon the calendar defendants were entitled to have their resulting default opened without terms, and the order appealed from is modified accordingly.

Order modified by striking therefrom all conditions for the payment of costs, and order as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants to abide the event.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 Misc. 923, 212 N.Y.S. 295, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitzas-v-spector-nyappterm-1925.