Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp.

E.D. California

Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 18, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-01494·Unknown

Opinion

11 MITY-LITE, INC., CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01494 AWI JLT

12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 15) 13 v. 14 EDSAL SANDUSKY CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice with each side to 18 bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 15) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes 19 such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San 20 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close 21 this action. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March 17, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25

26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11 MITY-LITE, INC., CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01494 AWI JLT

12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 15) 13 v. 14 EDSAL SANDUSKY CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice with each side to 18 bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 15) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes 19 such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San 20 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close 21 this action. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March 17, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25

26 27 28

Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Pincite

Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp. (Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related