Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp.

E.D. California

Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 18, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-01494·Unknown

Opinion

MITY-LITE, INC., CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01494 AWI JLT

Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 15) v. EDSAL SANDUSKY CORPORATION, Defendant. The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 15) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MITY-LITE, INC., CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01494 AWI JLT

Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 15) v. EDSAL SANDUSKY CORPORATION, Defendant. The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 15) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Pincite

Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp. (Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related