Mittleman v. Koffler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mittleman v. Koffler

248 A.D. 889, 291 N.Y.S. 159, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7950

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 889 (Mittleman v. Koffler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mittleman v. Koffler, 248 A.D. 889, 291 N.Y.S. 159, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in negligence to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in an automobile accident, order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate and set aside order precluding plaintiff from giving evidence on the trial with respect to certain items set forth in a prior order directing plaintiff to serve a bill of particulars reversed on the law and the facts and the motion granted upon condition that within five days from the entry of the order hereon the sum of $100 be paid to the respondent by plaintiff’s attorney personally because of his neglect in the premises; the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. In the event of failure to make such payment and serve such bill the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in negligence to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in an automobile accident, order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate and set aside order precluding plaintiff from giving evidence on the trial with respect to certain items set forth in a prior order directing plaintiff to serve a bill of particulars reversed on the law and the facts and the motion granted upon condition that within five days from the entry of the order hereon the sum of $100 be paid to the respondent by plaintiff’s attorney personally because of his neglect in the premises; the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. In the event of failure to make such payment and serve such bill the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 889, 291 N.Y.S. 159, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mittleman-v-koffler-nyappdiv-1936.