Mittelsdorf v. Riconed, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Mittelsdorf v. Riconed, Inc.

186 So. 2d 19, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3655

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 1966

DocketNo. 34777

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 2d 19 (Mittelsdorf v. Riconed, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mittelsdorf v. Riconed, Inc., 186 So. 2d 19, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3655 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 20, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petition for attorneys’ fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI