Mittakarin v. Infotran Systems, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mittakarin v. Infotran Systems, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 F.R.D. 38
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 17, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-0017·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) DENIS MITTAKARIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 11-0017(EGS) v. ) ) INFOTRAN SYSTEMS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum

Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss all

claims against defendants InfoTran Systems, Inc. and Tien H.

Tran pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) is

GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED

without prejudice. This is a final, appealable Order. See Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED: Emmet G. Sullivan United States District Court Judge January 17, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mittakarin v. Infotran Systems, Inc., (D.D.C. 2012).

Mittakarin v. Infotran Systems, Inc. (Mittakarin v. Infotran Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.