Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Sho Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Sho Group

81 A.D.2d 777, 440 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11417

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 777 (Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Sho Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Sho Group, 81 A.D.2d 777, 440 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 24, 1980, insofar as it denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the third cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the cross appeal from said order insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to serve an amended complaint and to strike scandalous material dismissed as nonappealable, without costs and without disbursements. (See 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5701.26b; CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 3.) No opinion. Concur — Birns, J.P, Sullivan, Markewich, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 24, 1980, insofar as it denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the third cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the cross appeal from said order insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to serve an amended complaint and to strike scandalous material dismissed as nonappealable, without costs and without disbursements. (See 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5701.26b; CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 3.) No opinion. Concur — Birns, J.P, Sullivan, Markewich, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 777, 440 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitsubishi-international-corp-v-sho-group-nyappdiv-1981.