Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Century Moving & Warehouse Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Century Moving & Warehouse Co.

50 A.D.2d 788, 377 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11595

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 788 (Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Century Moving & Warehouse Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Century Moving & Warehouse Co., 50 A.D.2d 788, 377 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 14, 1975, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondents. Since it appears that the named defendants and not the union local were instrumental in preventing plaintiff from removing its goods from the leased space, [789]*789the temporary injunction properly issued. The agreement with the union, covering as it does only warehousing, storage and commercial moving, has no bearing upon the lease agreement entered into with Mitsubishi, and therefore the union was not a necessary party defendant. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 14, 1975, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondents. Since it appears that the named defendants and not the union local were instrumental in preventing plaintiff from removing its goods from the leased space, [789]*789the temporary injunction properly issued. The agreement with the union, covering as it does only warehousing, storage and commercial moving, has no bearing upon the lease agreement entered into with Mitsubishi, and therefore the union was not a necessary party defendant. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 788, 377 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitsubishi-international-corp-v-century-moving-warehouse-co-nyappdiv-1975.