Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Mitman v. POLICE PENSION COM'N

Mitman v. POLICE PENSION COM'N

23 A.3d 527
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 19, 2011·No. 64 MAP 2010·Published

Opinion

23 A.3d 527 (2011)

Philip B. MITMAN, Mayor of the City of Easton, on behalf of the CITY OF EASTON, Appellant
v.
POLICE PENSION COMMISSION OF the CITY OF EASTON and Matthew Renninger, Appellees.

No. 64 MAP 2010

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 10, 2011.
Decided July 19, 2011.

Ryan J. Cassidy, Reed Smith, L.L.P., Philadelphia, Joel Martin Scheer, Fishbone & Scheer, P.C., Easton, for Philip B. Mitman, Mayor of the City of Easton, on behalf of the City of Easton.

Gary Neil Asteak, Easton, for Matthew Renninger.

Ralph Jeffery Bellafatto, Easton, for Police Pension Commission of the City of Easton.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2011, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitman v. POLICE PENSION COM'N, 23 A.3d 527 (Pa. 2011).

23 A.3d 527 (Mitman v. POLICE PENSION COM'N) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.