Mithell v. Allen

12 Wend. 290
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 19, 1835·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The motion cannot be heard. It is the settled practice that a motion cannot be renewed without leave of the court. The case of Standard v. Williams decides nothing to the contrary of such practice it is there said, the party may apply to the court, upon notice to vacate the rule denying his motion. So he may: but not without leave of the court previously obtained, which is all ways granted, if, in the circumstances of the opposition, there is any thing to excite suspicion of unfairness, or a belief that the party moving is taken by surprise. Indeed it is not unusual for the court, without application, to-annex such leave to. a denial of a motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mithell v. Allen, 12 Wend. 290 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1835).

12 Wend. 290 (Mithell v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Satterlee
20 F. Cas. 1046 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California, 1874)
Akerly v. Vilas
1 F. Cas. 259 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin, 1872)
Hall v. Emmons
8 Abb. Pr. 451 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1870)
Belmont v. Erie Railway Co.
52 Barb. 637 (New York Supreme Court, 1869)
Cazneau v. Bryant
4 Abb. Pr. 402 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1857)
Bellinger v. Martindale
8 How. Pr. 113 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Mills v. Thursby
11 How. Pr. 114 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Willet v. Fayerweather
1 Barb. 72 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
Dollfus v. Frosch
5 Hill & Den. 493 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)